hey can anyone tell me what either of these bikes has over the other and what your personal preferences are?? 140xr is based on the klx design and the other on the crf. any help would be appreciated as im looking to purchase one of them shortly. the crf style seems more popular but i`ve been told the klx design and package is a better option. also do u have any info on the big bore 155cc kit to suit with the ceramic bore?? both bikes are advertised on ebay if ur interested... thanx for any help
Hi jackliveshere.
If you would like to see the difference up close we have the 2 types of bikes in stock .There is quite a difference !!!
Feel free to phone us and drop in for a chat.
Check out our website
Regards Brian
__________________
EAST 50's Ph. 08 83635050 or 0410487366 www.east50s.com.au
Check out our new store at 199-201 Payneham rd. St Peters.
Last edited by Maylands Performance : 31-08-2007 at 09:43 AM.
Reason: ....
depends if you were a tall buy i would go the 140xr.
__________________ 2007 MSO X7R: Pro taper bars, Scott Grips, NGK Plug, Uni filter, Vee Rubber Rear Tyre with rim lock, Cutaway Fly Wheel Cover, R.K Racing Chain, Yamaha Kill Switch etc etc 1971 Honda Z50A - Currently Restoring
Brian where abouts r u located and do u have a phone number i could call u on if i have any questions?? i am near port pirie, cpl of hours nth of adelaide. u can im it to me if u prefer. also im about 170cm and have a agb29/pro x 125 and that is taller and seems more comfortable than the crf style but i think that might be bigger than the 140xr again.. let me know if u know otherwise
the bikes are the same. i went for the dhz 140 it is the same as the other 2 but comes with a joker quick turn throtle and folder leavers.it only cost me $849.
Its basically the same bike, Just different plastics and rear shock and a few other minor things, If the pitpro had the same fastace shock it would easly be the better bike.
Its basically the same bike, Just different plastics and rear shock and a few other minor things, If the pitpro had the same fastace shock it would easly be the better bike.
when u say the pitpro would be better im assuming u mean the pitpro 140 is better than the pitpro 140xr??
but in which way is it better?? surely the slightly bigger frame would be more stable, even if only a little and more comfortable. the only thing i can see better about the crf style bikes is they have more parts available, especially plastics and decals and wouldnt u think they would have improved on that design by now anyway. is there anyone who has actually owned both and has any details about the different rides??
Go the Pitty, I have one and I thrash the piss out of it constantly, and she goes well hard and there is loads of cheap accessories you can get for them, its only like a $1000 outlay if it shits itself just buy another.
__________________
Mods are Pro Tapers, Kitaco coil, Iridium plug, Kitaco clone rotor and sling, Port matched intake, Uni Filter, 42 tooth rear/16 front, Carbon ignition cover, Tall seat, Alloy throttle, Pro Circuit 1 piece stainless exhaust, Heat tape, 28mm Oko flatslide, Fastace AS-02's, Dnm shock, 150cc donk, hydro clutch nothing to extreme.
i got the pit pro 140xr and i thrash it every weekend and all weekend and only prob i have had is snapped leavers and thats because they are shit. oh, and bent handle bars...trees not wide enough and couldnt slow down enough from 3rd gear pinned.
used to have the pit pro 125 with the cradel frame and i cracked the frame in a few places from jumping it but the frame on the 140xr has copped a hell of a lot more abuse and its still going strong. also the fast ace shock on the 140xr is a heap better than the standard nitro shock the 125s and 140s come with. Also the seat is a heap better on the xr than the others.